Fandom

Alternate History

Timeline (Principia Moderni III Map Game)

40,504pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk4 Share

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

The most popular map game and page overall on this wiki is Principia Moderni III. That's when I came with the idea "What if Principia Moderni III came out differently?" Do to support on users from chat, I decided to make this page. Welcome to the Principia Moderni III Community Timeline! This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 02:57, September 17, 2014 (UTC)


Sign Ups

Timeline Ideas

Italy isn't taken over, mainly due to more activeness from the user, and establishes a in the place of OTL Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 03:03, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Pskov stays part of Moscow, never becomes Russian Venice ...-Lx (leave me a message)Azarath Flag 03:09, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

By the user do you mean Crim never leaving? Or do you mean a more successful Quashi campaign? @Saturn 

This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 03:10, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

To clarify I'd prefer if the PODs start in or around 1400 with the game start, I think it would be interesting how a minor change at the start will effect the future. As this is a community tl, though, I propose a vote on whether to do 1400 PODs or different PODs.

I agree, and I meant Crim too. Saturn (Talk/Blog) 03:14, September 17, 2014 (UTC) o clarify I'd prefer if the PODs start in or around 1400 with the game start, I think it would be interesting how a minor change at the start will effect the future. As this is a community tl, though, I propose a vote on whether to do 1400 PODs or different PODs. We also need to decide whether we should have one or multiple PODS.  

Inca don't give up the northern half of their empire, France invades to talk what they want and the war escalates, breaking up the Franco-Spanish Alliance in a bloody turn of events, if later PODs are allowed. Westminster would also keep the war from expanding much further than France v. Spain. I am on the edge... The EdgeofNight

PROVIDED that this gets the OK from Collie, Ms, Feud, and Sine ... then I'd suggest a TL where there is no Muscovite Crusade (I mean, we can all agree it was pretty implausible to begin with), leading to P-L controlling Moscow and then going on to get into a big war with the Golden Horde. Pink Floyd Hammer Flag - The Wall I'd rather be a hammer than a nail... 01:08, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Vote: One PoD or Multiple PoDs?

One PoD

Multiple PoDs

Result: 

There shall be Multiple PoDs 


Vote:1400 PoD(s) 

I propose that PoDs should be within five to ten years of the 1400 start date of PMIII.

Aye

Nay

  • There is a lot of potential in later PODs

I am on the edge...  The EdgeofNight

Neutral 

Edge has raised a valid point, while I prefer the PoDs to stay with five to ten years of the original start of the game, there is a lot of potential with later PoDs. Thus I am neutral on this. This is UglyTurtle, Signing off. 01:11, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I also agree with Turt on this debate. JoshTheRoman

Result: 

There shall be PoDs later than five to ten years of the start date (unless we get more Ayes soon, as there is one Aye, two Nays, and two Neutrals,)


In Character PODs vs Out of Character PODs

Let me explain what I mean. An in-character POD is something like "the Muscovite Crusade fails/never happens." while an out of character POD is something like "Rex never plays as Egypt, allowing MP to vassalize it with out a war." Understand what I mean? I personally think that only in character PODs should be allowed. I am on the edge... The EdgeofNight

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki