Brazil[]
Brazil is to be made a Security Council Member as well, to represent South America.
About Korea...[]
I don't think Korea should be part of the Security Council. It can be a member of the UN, but the Council shouldn't outnumber the members Batmanary 00:37, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Whoops! I forgot to add it to the non-permanant part. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 21:21, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Yugoslavia[]
It is possible we make a 3rd resolution, about; Yugoslavia should enter the UN?Collie Kaltenbrunner 19:37, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
They are in the UN. They're just not not a non-perm SC member.Batmanary 19:50, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
- What? didn't you just said that it being a non-perm SC Member had to be voted?Collie Kaltenbrunner 20:14, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. you don't have to be SC to be in the UN...therefore Yugoslavia is in the UN, but its not non-perm SC
- Then Why you (or somebody else) removed my reference to Yugoslavia in the Non-Perm SC?Collie Kaltenbrunner 21:07, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Because while you are in the UN, you are NOT in the Security Counsil. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 21:21, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
France...[]
I do not think France should be a non-perm SC...on that note, only two non-perm SCs!!! The Security Council shouldn't outnumber the regular members!!!!! Batmanary
Well, I think we need to set a ratio for SC to norm. We currently have 18 members, the ratio could be 1:10 or something, then later, it stops at 1:20 or something? PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 22:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Honestly we should just take out non-perm SC, and just have the SC and the normal members, to keep the game balanced. Batmanary
Yah, I think we need that to keep certain nations from gaining too much power through the UN. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 22:13, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Can Finland be a UN member? Fed (talk) 23:39, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Debate: Ethiopia[]
So as not to clutter up the main page, I think we should have a debate about the legitimacy of SD's invasion and possible ways to alleviate the problem.
Turkey/Sweden: The invasion is illegitimate and completely uncalled for. The basic laws of war state that you cannot invade a nation without some sort of precedent. Saudi Arabia has none and as such they should leave the soveriegn nation of Ethiopia immediately. Reparations are not needed but they should be payed either way.
Joining[]
How do I get China into the UN, a statement on the main page or just put it on the list? Ownerzmcown 13:36, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
You can request to join by contacting me. 
PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 00:16, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, so can I join, it just seems easy to ask you here? Ownerzmcown 14:32, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
UN bills.[]
A simple majoraty of players pass them and make it wold law. Oxfordshire 1972 15:33, August 26, 2011 (UTC)
and Veto powes(AKA nuclear powers)?LxCaucassus 15:15, August 29, 2011 (UTC)
What is all this stuff that on here? is this a reused page? Draycos 03:15, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it was used for the first Axis vs Allies. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 21:47, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Security Council Members[]
I have a suggestion for the permanent members to be:
- China
- USA
- USSR
I suggest 4 other non permanent members which I can draw up every '7' years from a hat. With one replaced every Wednesday and Saturday
- Rep for Europe
- Rep for Europe
- Rep for Americas and Pacific
- Rep for Asia
Scandinator 06:46, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
I suggest[]
My suggestion for permanent members are:
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
- Democratic Republic of China
- Hindustan
- Empire of Japan
Non-Permanent is what Scandinator suggested. 
Imperium Guy 09:37, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Too many permanent members. Maybe Hundustan or the UK but otherwise there is too many. There is still the general assembly. Scandinator
I suggest Finland as a perm member as it has nukes and the SUMA backing its every move. Japan Just surrendered in a war so I doubt it would be a permanent member(not to mention being nuked 9 times)LxCaucassus 02:01, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
Try this bill.[]
Ban or restrict the use of the atom bomb.Oxfordshire 1972 11:06, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Carribean Union[]
I request a resolution to stop the war against the UCSR. CrimsonAssassin 12:41, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
1940's Mexico crisis[]
Venezuela's idea.
Split it temporaly, hold elections and reunite it as an indipendent state in 1947 or 1948?Oxfordshire 1972 17:11, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Whoa whoa whoa what happened to Cuba's earnings? CrimsonAssassin 17:50, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
Security Council[]
Assuming everyone will join, I have made the list of the nations using Random.org. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 20:56, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
The Soviet Union agrees Azecreth 21:44, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Please vote in the newest resolution. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 21:46, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
I accept Bobalugee1940 21:48, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Accepted ChrisL123 21:53, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
The UCSR says yes! CrimsonAssassin 22:54, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Italy agrees. Fed (talk) 22:55, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Britain Agrees gratefully. DeanSims 14:08, September 17, 2011 (UTC)
Non Player nations[]
Non player nations will vote/join based on Random.org, but it will be biased towards their goals and intentions (EX: in OTL, Israel and Iran will never side with anything, so 1-95 would be no, and 96-100 would be yes. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 21:54, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Permanent Members[]
The OTL Permanent members were just the winners of WWII. Since WWII never took place then I highly doubt France being in there. China was a member OTL and are much more powerful ATL. Hindustan also seems like a possible replacement for UK ATL...Scandinator 23:12, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
I think that the Scandinavian alliance should be there because A they have nukes and united they are more powerfull than they were apart. the scandinavian alliance will form the scandinavian confederation, and have FInland as their common advicate in foreign stuff because of the war they become more united. I think the perm members should be the powerfull nuclear nations/forces- USSR, USA, China, SUMA(Finland) and the UK-but mabe not(not Japan because they got nuked out of their life and becasue they're not that powerfull). I consider Finland/SUMA a viable replacement for france LxCaucassus 01:03, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
Scandinavian Unionism was dead by the beginning of the 1930's. The dissolution of the United Kingdom of Sweden and Norway was the death knell for that idea. Thus, and Scandinavian Confederation is implausible. Azecreth 01:40, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
But the thing is the game started in the 30s and the war made closer relations so BAM!LxCaucassus 23:15, September 20, 2011 (UTC)
But the map game began before the death-bell rang, therefore with a a minor-pod, it could probably exist! :D Imperium Guy 21:07, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
and that POD is the creation of the SUMA and the war with the USSR and the joint co-operation(one of finland's OTL goals), so a confederation like that WITH nuclear arsenal and no WWII it could be a perm memberLxCaucassus 23:45, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
Carribean Union! CrimsonAssassin 01:17, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
I propose the Caribbean Union, or Italy. Fed (talk) 02:48, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
I am happy to be a member of the UN. :D Imperium Guy 09:36, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
K, used Random.org, Italy is in it. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 20:06, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Why isn't France on any of the lists now? ChrisL123 21:00, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Because France in reality only got in because of WWII. Also, Italy should not be a member of the permanent council as we aldready have a Europen member but we should have another Asian member as Soviet Union coveres two continents (Probably China or Hindustan) :D
Imperium Guy 21:07, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Because France in reality only got in because of WWII. Also, Italy should not be a member of the permanent council as we aldready have a Europen member but we should have another Asian member as Soviet Union coveres two continents (Probably China or Hindustan) :D
Nations[]
Any objections to adding Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, and Brazil to the UN? PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 20:08, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
There is none from Yugoslavia - Draycos
Thailand[]
Can Thailand be taken off the list? Thailand strongly refuses to join the UN and wants to leave this organisation... 9 もりや すわこ 20:21, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, but your loss. PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 20:23, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
More nations:[]
Any objections to adding these nations:
Argentina
Colombia
Australia
Paraguay
Uruguay
Chile
Iraq?
PitaKang- (Talk|Contribs) 22:25, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
ICJ Decision[]
So... according to the ICJ Asia gets another one or two seats in the Security Council. China or Hindustan or both???? Also I believe the UK is inactive... Scandinator
Also is Italy still vetoing? Because they still get to keep their seat. Scandinator
Former Security Council[]
Why is Cuba not on the Security Council anymore? CrimsonAssassin 13:58, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
Because everyone exccept the Permanent SC rotates. Eventually you will be on it again. Azecreth 14:28, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
Italian Puppets[]
Given the fact Venezuela's puppets are in the United Nations, I wondered whether the Italian ones can be in the General Assembly as well? Fed (talk) 20:37, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
Go ahead, I have no problems. (2 of 3 set up, but rod puppets are better than glove or string puppets) Oxfordshire 1972 12:26, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
Join[]
How could I join the United Nations? Sure Baltika(united from the Baltics) can't be Security Council member, can it be a General Assembly member?He's Laptop Zombie, he's right here next to you! Send mails to him through his mailbox, and being an admin, here is what he did at this wiki. 10:32, November 7, 2011 (UTC)