Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
This is a page for the Dawn of the Dark Ages game. This page is for everything involving diplomacy, such as treaties, alliances, and other stuff. Basically, if you want to negotiate with other nations, but don't want to post in the main game, post here.
To negotiate with another nation, make a subforum in their nation section. If it involves more than one nation, post it in both of their sections, or make a new one with the appropriate title. Note: What you post here will be for everyone to see, so secret treaties are not possible. I don't know if this is necessary but I'm making it anyway.
I would like to propse an alliance between the two of us. It could forestall conflicts in the future over the territory in Scandinavia. If you have any preferences aout the divvying up of territory there, post a map that you propose we use. we might also include the Anglo-Saxons, in a Union of Baltic States.
I'm actually part Swedish, but I don't really care. I just want Norway, and all the available lands bordering the Skaggerak/Kattegat. You can have the rest of Sweden and all of Finland.BoredMatt 01:26, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. How about the alliance part? Azecreth 01:45, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
I would agree, but this is 500 AD, and it's not very likely that two loose confederations of various tribes that have had no previous contact whatsoever (and no common enemies) would suddenly sign an alliance. Maybe a marriage, or something like that?BoredMatt 01:51, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. Once we meet and we realize how powerful the two of us could be together, then we will have a marriage. Azecreth 02:16, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'm fine with it, but I want Burma and Siam. the rest you can have. Of course I would like Central Asia as well. I would like Kazakhstan but take Siam and the Sinkiang. Please?
Sure. Are we going to put a similar establishment of an alliance as the celts?
A non-aggression pact/economic alliance/defense pact (whichever you prefer, although the later would take a year or two to finishes the papers) between the Qi Dynasty and the Persian Kingdom would be great, as we have meet and you are expanding towards Qi empire and I am expanding towards you and south and north. I would care only for eastern OTL Russia and everything to the south (Tibetan tribal lands to OTL Australia. --DaBigUn 17:27, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
You can have Burma, but not Siam. As for Central Asia, Eastern Kazakhstan, orange and light-green one, as I cant read their name's. Siam is not negotiable. Have the rest except what is named here.
as long as you promises in a formal agreement to go no further east....sure.
depends where this leads to.....I don't want war with another nation as strong as you and would rather have an ally in the middle east to help conquer more Russia, but I don't know how the others well react. In time, most defiantly. --DaBigUn 18:35, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
You guys are the only players west of Europe, so I doubt that we would care. Just don't cross into Europe (over the Urals, in case you're wondering), because A):It's implausible; you aren't Huns, and Siberia is a big, big place; and B): I think Azecreth has designs on European Russia, and the Slavs could (probably) take it. BoredMatt 18:49, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
I do have designs on European Russia, although it may take a while for me to finish them, since I can't expand very fast. Azecreth 21:48, August 4, 2010 (UTC)