Khmer Empire (Ætas ab Brian)edit
From Alternative History
History of Rome-After Ætas ab Brian
| |||||
| Capital: | Nokor Wat | ||||
| Language: official: | Khimer (Eastern Variant) | ||||
| Other languages: | Khimer (Western Variant), Sinican, Latin | ||||
| Government: | Absolute Monarchy | ||||
| title of chief of government: | name of chief of government | ||||
| Area: | 357 968 km² | ||||
| Population: | ~11 482 289 inh. | ||||
| Established: | 1556; occupied 2061; re-est. 2067; destroyed 2190 | ||||
| Currency: | Ticau, Carici | ||||
The Khmer Empire prior to the Yellow Scare, in 2187(1434)
Contents |
[edit] Origins
Ancient Sinican records described powerful thalassocratic states in Indo-Sinica which tied trade routes between India and Sinica by sea since the 950's(200's). The core state that would become the Khmer Empire was called Fou-nan by the Sinicans and Nokor Borei by the natives. It was a major trade stop where Indian merchant ships road the monsoon winds to Nokor and then had to wait 6 months for the winds to reverse and blow them back. Indian influence on the Khmer was great and a unique cultural mix of East-Asian and Hindu architecture, religion, and traditions heavily defined its development. Sea faring civilisations easily grew in Ulterior Australis (Oceana) due to the rich trade of the Silk Road by sea.
Prior to 1556(803) much of Indo-Sinica passed in and out of Srivijava's influence.
[edit] Expansion into Siam
The Miasmata reached Indo-Sinica from its origins in India by mid 1602(849) and lasted until late 1604(851) fading away to the rest of Ulterior Australis.
The depopulation of the Mon, Chao-bon, Kensiu, and Kintaq lands (regions collectively called Sayam, OTL Malay Peninsula and western Thailand) during the Miasmata allowed Khmer's ruler Veasnavarman to expand into the areas [1631-5(878-82)] rather easily once they themselves had recovered and solidifying the entity of the Kingdom of Khmer. Sinica was still reeling from the Miasmata's effects and putting down revolts, otherwise it is likely Sinica would have gained control instead.
The regions were re-colonised by the Khmer during their relaxed invasions but were not treated as well as the territories closer to the capital.
[edit] Great Eastern Failure
Under the new king Daraphirin in 1878(1125), a new programme of empire building was attempted. Starting with invasions of Dai Viet in the 1880's(1127+), the Khmer armies experienced numerous defeats and ultimately failed to accomplish anything, most of the blame for which could be placed in the army's mismanagement by Daraphirin and his generals. Turning his attention to the Vijava(Champa) Confederacy in 1898(1145), Daraphirin made multiple invasion attempts but accomplished little more than he had in Dai Viet. Returning home in defeat in 1904(1151), Daraphirin would face civil war upon his arrival and was killed in the uprisings later that year. Paramavishnok I was appointed the new king by Khmer's nobles in late 1904(1151).
[edit] Nihonian Interests
Nihonia's imperial endeavors throughout the 19th century(1050+) had little effect on the Khmer, even as the Nihonians built forts on the Chem Than coasts, subjugated the Champa kingdom, and impeded Khmer trade ships. In 1930(1177) the Nihonian armies began an invasion of Khmer itself, managing to kill the king Paramavishnok II and occupying the capital. However, Paramavishnok III was able to re-assemble the armies and hire mercenaries from both Sayam and Dai Viet to push the Nihonians back to Champa. Relative peace was achieved and lasted until renewed Nihonian interests put the Khmer on Rome's side in the Amplus Arma.
[edit] Decline
The Khmer Empire used the outdated government system of absolute monarchy. Of all the members of the Concilium Mundi, it was the only nation to fully stick to its traditional ruling structure, although in the period 1949-1973(1196-1220) they experimented with a parliamentary system with a set term for the king.
Understandably, the archaic system caused civil trouble (much like that experienced by the former Muscovite Empire), but even through Nihhon's occupation of the Empire from 2061-7 and the partition of Siam afterwards, the monarchy still commanded full power (actually, during the occupation and for a short time after, the monarchy enjoyed greater loyalty as they served as a symbol for 'freedom' and tradition). So, the emperors of Khmer continued to rule, their government lacking some of the security of more modern systems (and also lacking some that they hadn't bothered to install). Thusly, that Khmer was the only nation in Aisa Ulterior to fall during the 'Yellow Scare' did not seem so surprising after the fact. The country was accepted as lost in 2190(1437), becoming the Konsi-Thang Cartel
[edit] Rulers
| King | from | to | period | notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Veasnavarman I | ~1631(878)) | 1679(926) | [48yrs] | |
| 2. | Chenruhi | 1679(926) | 1695(942) | [16yrs] | |
| 3. | Samnagaman | 1695(942) | 1775(1022) | [80yrs] | longest reigning king, may have actually been a look alike later on |
| 4. | Ebolanaraman | 1775(1022) | 1812(1059) | [37yrs] | |
| 5. | Phokunviraman I | 1812(1059) | 1864(1111) | [52yrs] | |
| 6. | Veasnavarman II | 1864(1111) | 1878(1125) | [14yrs] | |
| 7. | Daraphirin | 1878(1125) | 1904(1151) | [26yrs] | |
| 8. | Paramavishnok I | 1904(1151) | 1919(1166) | [15yrs] | |
| 9. | Paramavishnok II | 1919(1166) | 1930(1177) | [11yrs] | |
| 10. | Paramavishnok III | 1930(1177) | 1949(1196) | [19yrs] | |
| 11. | Paramavishnok IV | 1949(1196) | 1955(1202) | [6yrs] | first king of the parliamentary system |
| 12. | Vannaraman I | 1955(1202) | 1961(1208) | [6yrs] | |
| 13. | Veasnavarman III | 1961(1208) | 1967(1214) | [6yrs] | |
| 14. | Javayaraman I | 1967(1214) | 1973(1220) | [6yrs] | last king of the parliamentary system |
| 15. | Veasnavarman IV | 1973(1220) | 2043(1290) | [70yrs] | |
| 16. | Paramavishnok V | 2043(1290) | 2049(1296) | [6yrs] | advocated the return of a parliamentary system and stepped down |
| 17. | Harpichanaravabrimaman | 2049(1296) | 2059(1306) | [10yrs] | |
| 18. | Javayaraman II | 2059(1306) | 2063(1310) | [4yrs] | |
| Nihonian Occupation | 2063(1310) | 2067(1314) | [5yrs] | much of Khmer had been occupied since 2061(1308) | |
| 19. | Veasnavarman V | 2067(1314) | 2081(1328) | [14yrs] | |
| 20. | Veasnavarman VI | 2081(1328) | 2089(1336) | [8yrs] | |
| 21. | Veasnavarman VI | 2081(1328) | 2089(1336) | [8yrs] | |
| 22. | Javayaraman III | 2089(1336) | 2093(1340) | [4yrs] | |
| 23. | Paramavishnok VI | 2093(1340) | 2104(1351) | [11yrs] | |
| 24. | Veasnavarman VII | 2104(1351) | 2116(1363) | [12yrs] | |
| 25. | Veasnavarman VIII | 2116(1363) | 2146(1403) | [30yrs] | |
| 26. | Vannaraman II | 2146(1403) | 2162(1419) | [16yrs] | |
| 27. | Phokunviraman II | 2162(1419) | 2172(1429) | [10yrs] | |
| 28. | Paramavishnok VII | 2172(1429) | 2190(1437) | [18yrs] | last King of the Khmer |
