Alternative History
Advertisement
This NotLAH page is a Proposal.


It has not been ratified and is therefore not yet a part of the NotLAH Timeline. You are welcome to correct errors and/or comment at the Talk Page. If you add this label to an article, please do not forget to make mention of it on the main discussion page for the Timeline.


Under contruction icon-red The following page is under construction.

Please do not edit or alter this article in any way while this template is active. All unauthorized edits may be reverted on the admin's discretion. Propose any changes to the talk page.

This page contains a list of nations in the map game Night of the Living Alternate History, showing how powerful they are, which will give or remove points from them on an algorithm. You may add a nation to a list, but keep it plausible. No Icelandic superpowers on Turn One.

Tier 1 (Superpower)[]

These nations have the capacity to project their power and influence across the globe and have the plausible capacity to gain the status of worldwide hegemony.

  1. New Commonwealth (Canada, Oceania and UK Combined) This is per nation, not organizations. If this is one nation then some players need to play as someone else. If not, it doesn't belong on this page at all.

Tier 2 (Major Powers)[]

These are states which have the ability to or to potentially exert their influence on a world scale

  1.  Russia
  2.  United States (Debatable)
  3.  United Republics
  4.  Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand
  5.  South Africa
  6.  Japan
  7.  United Kingdom
  8.  France (Debatable)

Tier 3 (Regional Powers)[]

These nations hold major power and influence in their area, and have some worldwide.[]
  1. Texas (Debatable)
  2. Wu (Debatable)
  3. Canada
  4. Scandinavia
  5. Netherlands
  6. Cascadia
  7. Halifax
  8. Austria
  9. New Romania
  10. Federation of the Arabian Peninsula
  11. Appalachian Federal Republic

Tier 4 (Minor Powers)[]

These nations have some influence in their area, and little to none worldwide.[]
  1. Spain
  2. Florida
  3. Italy
  4. Northern California
  5. New England
  6. Israel
  7. Halifax
  8. Dinetah
  9. Republic of Ireland
  10. Saudi Arabia
  11. Turkey
  12. Brazil
  13. Bay Republic
  14. Las Cruces
  15. Afghanistan

Tier 5[]

  1. Iran
  2. Iraq
  3. Vietnam
  4. Guyana
  5. Ethiopia

Tier 6 (Minor vassals and Dependencies)[]

  1. Grand Duchies, Duchies, Principalities, and Free Cities of the HRE
  2. City States of the Southwest League
  3. Falkland Islands

Superpower Nomination[]

Nominate one of the six major powers for superpower status. Votes are anonymous, just put a number suceeding the one before it. Put your signature in the votes section

Nation Vote
United States
Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand
Russia
United Republics
South Africa
Japan

Discussion[]

Is the voting one vote for each nation, so that you vote yes or no for each nation, or do you only get one vote total? Mscoree (talk) 18:17, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's one total. 1 Imp (Say Hi?!) 18:22, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Not that it matters, because this isn't implemented. And someone screwed this up in the beginning. G greg e (talk) Someone messed this up...as of my editing there have only been 11 editors and there are well more than 11 points on that board...also France the the UK should be removed from this. 

Should we do a recount? Canada2hy Hypothetical Alberta Blue Ensign OreoToast555(Talk) 18:46, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I think everyone should get one vote for each nation (Yes or no, one means yes, not voting means no). Mscoree (talk) 18:59, July 11, 2013 (UTC) Let's just start again. But should be do this anonymously? :L 1 Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:05, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't really need to be anonymous. We should probably be signed in and what not to make sure they're not sockpuppets voting. Mscoree (talk) 19:09, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I say we vote, thus recounting, you vote yes or no and provide a short reasoning, or reference someone elses reasoning, also these should be done completely Out of Game Character. G greg e (talk) 19:09, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Greg. Should we do it the old fashioned way, where everyone signs underneath it? Mscoree (talk) 19:10, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Makes sense. 1 Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:11, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

So this time everyone gets multiple votes, right? Mscoree (talk) 14:47, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

I guess? Canada2hy Hypothetical Alberta Blue Ensign OreoToast555(Talk) 17:59, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

LOL, no one votes for me. :( 1 Imp (Say Hi?!) 19:40, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

I felt sorry for Imp Mafia (talk)



Advertisement